Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.4
Moonshot AI Kimi K3 | OpenAI GPT-5.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 16 2026 | Mar 5 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 2.8T | — |
Context window | 1M | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 48% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.0Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. Higher is better. | 67.5% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 83% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 88.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 75.1% |
Software engineering Expert-SWE (Internal)OpenAI's private set of expert-level software-engineering problems. Higher is better. | — | 68.5% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 84.2% | — |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 52.9% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 73.2% | — |
General tool use ToolathlonTests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | — | 54.6% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 91.2%Best | 82.7% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 43.5% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 56% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | — | 47.6% |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | — | 27.1% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 93.5%Best | 92.8% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 75% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1668 | — |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | — | 83% |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 81.6% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1476 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1457 |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GPT-5.4 shipped 133 days before Kimi K3 | |
Which is better: Kimi K3 or GPT-5.4?
Kimi K3 leads GPT-5.4 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BrowseComp, GPQA Diamond). GPT-5.4 shipped 133 days before Kimi K3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K3 is open weight, while GPT-5.4 is proprietary.
On BrowseComp, Kimi K3 leads at 91.2% vs GPT-5.4 at 82.7%. On GPQA Diamond, Kimi K3 leads at 93.5% vs GPT-5.4 at 92.8%.
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K3 was released by Moonshot AI on Jul 16 2026.
GPT-5.4 was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
Kimi K3 leads on GPQA Diamond — Kimi K3 93.5% vs GPT-5.4 92.8%.
Kimi K3 is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI. GPT-5.4 is a proprietary model released by OpenAI.
Other comparisons
Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 5Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.4 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashKimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark 1.1Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4.5Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProKimi K3 vs Mistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5