Muse Spark 1.1 vs Kimi K3
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 | Moonshot AI Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Jul 9 2026 | Jul 16 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 2.8T |
Context window | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 61.5% | — |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 53.3% | — |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.0Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. Higher is better. | — | 67.5% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 80% | 88.3%Best |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 88.1%Best | 84.2% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 54.7%Best | 52.9% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 75.6%Best | 73.2% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 91.2% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 43.5% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 62.1%Best | 56% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 93.5% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
Tax questions TaxEval v2A set of real tax questions created by Vals AI — can the AI give accurate answers about tax rules and filings? Higher is better. | 79.72% | — |
Medical admin work MedScribeCan the AI support doctors with their administrative work, like notes and paperwork? Created by Vals AI. Higher is better. | 88.89% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1668 |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 88.4%Best | 84.8% |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | 76.3% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 81.6% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1490 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1540 | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 7 days before Kimi K3 | |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Kimi K3?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads Kimi K3 on 5 of the 6 benchmarks they both report. Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 7 days before Kimi K3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary, while Kimi K3 is open weight.
On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Kimi K3 leads at 88.3% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 80%. On MCP Atlas, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 88.1% vs Kimi K3 at 84.2%. On JobBench, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 54.7% vs Kimi K3 at 52.9%. On Toolathlon-Verified, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 75.6% vs Kimi K3 at 73.2%. On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 62.1% vs Kimi K3 at 56%. On CharXiv Reasoning, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 88.4% vs Kimi K3 at 84.8%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
Kimi K3 was released by Moonshot AI on Jul 16 2026.
Kimi K3 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — Muse Spark 1.1 80% vs Kimi K3 88.3%.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · with tools — Muse Spark 1.1 62.1% vs Kimi K3 56%.
Muse Spark 1.1 is a proprietary model released by Meta. Kimi K3 is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI.