DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse Spark 1.1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 61.5% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9%Best | 80% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 88.1% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 54.7% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | 75.6%Best |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60% | 62.1%Best |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 80.8% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 57.2% |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
Tax questions TaxEval v2A set of real tax questions created by Vals AI — can the AI give accurate answers about tax rules and filings? Higher is better. | — | 79.72% |
Medical admin work MedScribeCan the AI support doctors with their administrative work, like notes and paperwork? Created by Vals AI. Higher is better. | — | 88.89% |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 88.4% |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | — | 76.3% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1490 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1540 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Jul 9 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 on 2 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon-Verified, Humanity's Last Exam). Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 35 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Terminal-Bench 2.1, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 87.9% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 80%. On Toolathlon-Verified, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 75.6% vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 at 74.1%. On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 62.1% vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 at 60%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 87.9% vs Muse Spark 1.1 80%.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · with tools — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 60% vs Muse Spark 1.1 62.1%.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.1vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberMuse Spark 1.1vsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.1vsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.1vsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsKimi K3Muse Spark 1.1vsKimi K3