GPT-5.4
Released
GPT-5.4 is an AI model released by OpenAI on Thursday, Mar 5 2026, 21 days after GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark. Benchmark results (shown below) cover BullshitBench v2, ProgramBench, Next.js Evals, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Expert-SWE (Internal), Toolathlon, and 8 more.
Get OpenAI releases and AI news.
One email, every other Monday.
API pricing
- InputWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it.
- $2.50
- Cached inputA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again.
- $0.25
- OutputWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one.
- $15.00
Available from
| Azure | — | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azure | eu | $2.75 | $16.50 | 1M |
| Azure | us | $2.75 | $16.50 | 1M |
| Amazon Bedrock | us-east-1 | $2.75 | $16.50 | 1M |
Benchmarks
Coding
ProgramBenchProgram reconstruction — The AI receives a working program and its documentation, then builds a replacement from scratch without the original source code, internet access or decompilation. The score is the percentage of 200 programs that pass every behavioral test. We record each model's best published mini-SWE-agent result, including higher reasoning efforts where available. Partial test-pass rates and almost-solved programs do not count toward this score. Equal scores share a rank here; the official board also uses partial progress to break ties. Higher is better.
0%
via ProgramBench
#5 of 17Best: Claude Opus 5 · 4.5%
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better.
65%
#16 of 28Best: Claude Fable 5.1 · 97%
Expert-SWE (Internal)Software engineering — OpenAI's private set of expert-level software-engineering problems. Higher is better.
68.5%
#2 of 2Best: GPT-5.5 · 73.1%
Terminal & CLI
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better.
75.1%
#3 of 14Best: Claude Mythos 5 · 88%
Agentic & tool use
ToolathlonGeneral tool use — Tests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better.
54.6%
#3 of 5Best: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 56.5%
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better.
82.7%
#19 of 28Best: GPT-5.6 Sol · 92.2%
CyberGymCybersecurity — Tests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better.
79%
#7 of 10Best: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 88.1%
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better.
75%
#13 of 28Best: Qwen3.8-Max · 86.1%
Reasoning & science
Humanity's Last ExamMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better.
#20 of 42Best: Claude Fable 5.1 · 65%
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better.
73.95%
via BenchLM
#10 of 21Best: GPT-6 Astra · 95%
FrontierMathAdvanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better.
47.6%
Tier 1–3
27.1%
Tier 4
Tier 1–3
#4 of 6Best: GPT-5.5-Pro · 52.4%
Tier 4
#4 of 6Best: GPT-5.5-Pro · 39.6%
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better.
92.8%
#7 of 59Best: GPT-6 Astra · 96%
Knowledge work
GDPval (win/tie rate)Knowledge work — How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better.
83%
#2 of 6Best: GPT-5.5 · 84.9%
Robustness
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better.
48%
#31 of 77Best: Claude Opus 4.8 · 95%
Source: ProgramBench, retrieved 11 September 2026 · Source: BenchLM, retrieved 31 August 2026. Every other score here is the figure the lab published at launch.
Compare GPT-5.4 with
Suggested comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 was released by OpenAI on Thursday, Mar 5 2026.
All OpenAI releases
44 tracked2026
14 releasesGPT-6 Astra
Sep 3 2026
GPT-5.6-Cyber
Aug 10 2026
GPT-5.6 Sol
Jun 26 2026
GPT-5.6 Terra
Jun 26 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna
Jun 26 2026
GPT-5.5-Cyber
Jun 22 2026
GPT-5.5
Apr 23 2026
GPT-5.5-Pro
Apr 23 2026
GPT-5.4 mini
Mar 17 2026
GPT-5.4 nano
Mar 17 2026
GPT-5.4
Mar 5 2026
GPT-5.4-Pro
Mar 5 2026
GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
Feb 12 2026
GPT-5.3-Codex
Feb 5 2026
2025
22 releasesGPT-5.2
Dec 11 2025
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Nov 19 2025
GPT-5.1
Nov 12 2025
GPT-5-Codex-Mini
Nov 7 2025
GPT-5-Codex
Sep 15 2025
GPT-5
Aug 7 2025
GPT-5 mini
Aug 7 2025
GPT-5 nano
Aug 7 2025
GPT-5 Pro
Aug 7 2025
gpt-oss-120b
Aug 5 2025
gpt-oss-20b
Aug 5 2025
o3-pro
Jun 10 2025
o3
Apr 16 2025
o4-mini
Apr 16 2025
o4-mini-high
Apr 16 2025
GPT-4.1
Apr 14 2025
GPT-4.1 mini
Apr 14 2025
GPT-4.1 nano
Apr 14 2025
o1-pro
Mar 19 2025
GPT-4.5
Feb 27 2025
o3-mini
Jan 31 2025
o3-mini-high
Jan 31 2025