Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.50Mistral |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.50Mistral |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 48% | 2% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.2% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 52% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 31.1% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.9% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 81% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | |
| Release date | Nov 18 2025 | Dec 2 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Large 3vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.0 ProvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Large 3vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.0 ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Large 3vsMuse Spark 1.3Gemini 3.0 ProvsGrok 4.7Mistral Large 3vsGrok 4.7Gemini 3.0 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMistral Large 3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 3.0 ProvsKimi K3Mistral Large 3vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Pro leads Mistral Large 3 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Mistral Large 3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemini 3.0 Pro. Gemini 3.0 Pro shipped 14 days before Mistral Large 3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.0 Pro is closed, while Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemini 3.0 Pro leads at 48% vs Mistral Large 3 at 2%.