Nemotron 3 SupervsGPT-5.4
Nemotron 3 Super | GPT-5.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 120B | — |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $2.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $15.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.25 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $2.50Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $15.00Azure |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 79.2% | 92.8% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 48% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 60.5% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 83% |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 75.1% |
Expert-SWE (Internal)Software engineering — OpenAI's private set of expert-level software-engineering problems. Higher is better. | — | 68.5% |
ToolathlonGeneral tool use — Tests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | — | 54.6% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 82.7% |
CyberGymCybersecurity — Tests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 73.95% |
FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | — | 47.6% |
FrontierMath · Tier 4Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | — | 27.1% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 75% |
AA Intelligence IndexOverall intelligence — Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | 36 | — |
GDPval (win/tie rate)Knowledge work — How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | — | 83% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | OpenAI |
| Release date | Mar 11 2026 | Mar 5 2026 |
| Access | Open Source | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Nemotron 3 SupervsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.4vsClaude Opus 5Nemotron 3 SupervsGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.4vsGemini 3.7 FlashNemotron 3 SupervsMuse GlimmerGPT-5.4vsMuse GlimmerNemotron 3 SupervsGrok 4.6GPT-5.4vsGrok 4.6Nemotron 3 SupervsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GPT-5.4vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Nemotron 3 SupervsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.4vsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 leads Nemotron 3 Super on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Only GPT-5.4 has a verified first-party API price: $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Super. GPT-5.4 shipped 6 days before Nemotron 3 Super, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Nemotron 3 Super is open source, while GPT-5.4 is proprietary.
On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4 leads at 92.8% vs Nemotron 3 Super at 79.2%.
Nemotron 3 Super was released by NVIDIA on Mar 11 2026.
GPT-5.4 was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
GPT-5.4 leads on GPQA Diamond — Nemotron 3 Super 79.2% vs GPT-5.4 92.8%.
Only GPT-5.4 has a verified first-party API price: $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Super. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.
Nemotron 3 Super is an open source model released by NVIDIA. GPT-5.4 is a proprietary model released by OpenAI.