Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 48B | 550B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.50DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $2.20DeepInfra |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 49% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 71.9% |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 56.4% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 44.4% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 26.7% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.7% |
AA Intelligence IndexOverall intelligence — Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 48 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Oct 30 2025 | Jun 4 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Source |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi LinearvsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3 UltravsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi LinearvsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3 UltravsGPT-6.1 SolKimi LinearvsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3 UltravsGemini 4 ArgonKimi LinearvsMuse Spark 1.3Nemotron 3 UltravsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi LinearvsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3 UltravsGrok 4.7Kimi LinearvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3 UltravsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Kimi Linear and Nemotron 3 Ultra don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Kimi Linear shipped 217 days before Nemotron 3 Ultra, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi Linear has 48B parameters, while Nemotron 3 Ultra has 550B. Kimi Linear is open weight, while Nemotron 3 Ultra is open source.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi Linear and Nemotron 3 Ultra don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.