Muse Spark 1.3vsNemotron 3 Ultra
Muse Spark 1.3 | Nemotron 3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 550B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25Meta | $0.50DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25Meta | $2.20DeepInfra |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 71.9% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 75.4% | — |
SWEAtlas CodeBase QnACodebase understanding — Questions about how an unfamiliar codebase actually works — where something is handled, what a change would touch — answered by reading the repository rather than editing it. Tests understanding rather than patch-writing. Higher is better. | 59.4% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 88.8% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 64.9% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 44.4% |
DeepSearchQAAgentic browsing — Questions that cannot be answered from one page: the AI has to search the web, follow the trail across several sources, and put the pieces together into an answer. Higher is better. | 89.4% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 26.7% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.7% |
Agentic IF Index (Internal)Instruction following — Meta's internal measure of whether a model keeps following the instructions it was given while working as an agent — over a long run of tool calls, not just in a single reply. Higher is better. | 57.8% | — |
OSWorld 2.0Agentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Version 2.0 is a harder, refreshed task set. Higher is better. | 66.9% | — |
AutomationBenchBusiness workflows — Tests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 49.4% | — |
AA Intelligence IndexOverall intelligence — Artificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 48 |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1754 | — |
MRCR · 256k-512kLong context — Tests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document, here across inputs of roughly 256k to 512k tokens — several books' worth of text. Higher is better. | 98.5% | — |
MRCR · 512k-1MLong context — The same buried-detail retrieval test run on even longer inputs, from roughly 512k up to a million tokens. Scores usually slip as the document grows, so read it against the shorter span above. Higher is better. | 98.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Sep 2 2026 | Jun 4 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Source |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.3vsClaude Fable 5.1Nemotron 3 UltravsClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.3vsGPT-6 AstraNemotron 3 UltravsGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.3vsGemini 3.8 FlashNemotron 3 UltravsGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.3vsGrok 4.6Nemotron 3 UltravsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Nemotron 3 UltravsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.3vsMistral Medium 3.5Nemotron 3 UltravsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron 3 Ultra don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Nemotron 3 Ultra shipped 90 days before Muse Spark 1.3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark 1.3 is proprietary, while Nemotron 3 Ultra is open source.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron 3 Ultra don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Muse Spark 1.3 was released by Meta on Sep 2 2026.
Nemotron 3 Ultra was released by NVIDIA on Jun 4 2026.
Muse Spark 1.3 is a proprietary model released by Meta. Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open source model released by NVIDIA.