Gemini 3.0 ProvsQwen3-Coder-Next
Gemini 3.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 80B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.30 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.12Parasail |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.80Parasail |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.2% | 70.6% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench ProAgentic coding — Can the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 44.3% |
SWE-Bench MultilingualMultilingual coding — Like SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 62.8% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 52% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 36.2% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 31.1% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.9% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 81% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Nov 18 2025 | Feb 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 ProvsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.0 ProvsGPT-6 AstraQwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-6 AstraGemini 3.0 ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMuse Spark 1.3Gemini 3.0 ProvsGrok 4.6Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.6Gemini 3.0 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 3.0 ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Pro leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Only Qwen3-Coder-Next has a verified first-party API price: $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemini 3.0 Pro. Gemini 3.0 Pro shipped 77 days before Qwen3-Coder-Next, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.0 Pro is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Gemini 3.0 Pro leads at 76.2% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 70.6%.