Gemini 3.0 FlashvsNemotron 3 Nano
Gemini 3.0 Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 30B |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 90.4% | 73% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench ProAgentic coding — Can the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 49.6% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 78% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 68.3% |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 58% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 62% | — |
ToolathlonGeneral tool use — Tests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | 49.4% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 33.7% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 33.6% | — |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.1% | — |
Finance Agent v2Agentic financial analysis — Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 42.6% | — |
GDPval-AAKnowledge work — Measures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | 1204 | — |
CharXiv ReasoningChart reasoning — Can the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 80.3% | — |
MMMU-ProMultimodal reasoning — A tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 81.2% | — |
Blueprint-Bench 2Spatial reasoning — Can the AI reason about space and layout — for example, understanding a floor plan or blueprint? Higher is better. | 0% | — |
MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k averageLong context — Tests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document (around 128k tokens — roughly a long book). Higher is better. | 67.2% | — |
MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 1M pointwiseLong context — Tests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside an enormous document (around 1 million tokens — many books). Higher is better. | 22.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | |
| Release date | Dec 17 2025 | Dec 15 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Source |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 FlashvsClaude Opus 5Nemotron 3 NanovsClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsGPT-5.6 SolNemotron 3 NanovsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.0 FlashvsMuse GlimmerNemotron 3 NanovsMuse GlimmerGemini 3.0 FlashvsGrok 4.6Nemotron 3 NanovsGrok 4.6Gemini 3.0 FlashvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Nemotron 3 NanovsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Gemini 3.0 FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5Nemotron 3 NanovsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Flash leads Nemotron 3 Nano on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Nemotron 3 Nano shipped 2 days before Gemini 3.0 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.0 Flash is proprietary, while Nemotron 3 Nano is open source.
On GPQA Diamond, Gemini 3.0 Flash leads at 90.4% vs Nemotron 3 Nano at 73%.
Gemini 3.0 Flash was released by Google on Dec 17 2025.
Nemotron 3 Nano was released by NVIDIA on Dec 15 2025.
Gemini 3.0 Flash leads on GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.0 Flash 90.4% vs Nemotron 3 Nano 73%.
Gemini 3.0 Flash is a proprietary model released by Google. Nemotron 3 Nano is an open source model released by NVIDIA.