Composer 2.5vsQwQ-32B-Preview
Composer 2.5 | QwQ-32B-Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 32B |
Context window | — | 32k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 54% | — |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 79.8% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | 56.1% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | 63.2% | — |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.0Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. Higher is better. | 18% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 92% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 73% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 69.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Cursor | Qwen |
| Release date | May 18 2026 | Nov 28 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Composer 2.5 or QwQ-32B-Preview?
Composer 2.5 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. QwQ-32B-Preview shipped 536 days before Composer 2.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Composer 2.5 is proprietary, while QwQ-32B-Preview is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Composer 2.5 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Composer 2.5 was released by Cursor on May 18 2026.
QwQ-32B-Preview was released by Qwen on Nov 28 2024.
Composer 2.5 is a proprietary model released by Cursor. QwQ-32B-Preview is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
Composer 2.5vsClaude Opus 5QwQ-32B-PreviewvsClaude Opus 5Composer 2.5vsGPT-5.6 SolQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGPT-5.6 SolComposer 2.5vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGemini 3.6 FlashComposer 2.5vsMuse Spark 1.1QwQ-32B-PreviewvsMuse Spark 1.1Composer 2.5vsGrok 4.5QwQ-32B-PreviewvsGrok 4.5Composer 2.5vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731QwQ-32B-PreviewvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731