Composer 2.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Cursor Composer 2.5 | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Cursor | |
| Release date | May 18 2026 | May 19 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 55.1% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 79.8% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | 63.2%Best | 49.8% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 92% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 76.2% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 69.3% | — |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 83.6% |
General tool use ToolathlonTests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | — | 56.5% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 40.2% |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 72.1% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 78.4% |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 57.9% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | — | 1656 |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 84.2% |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 83.6% |
Spatial reasoning Blueprint-Bench 2Can the AI reason about space and layout — for example, understanding a floor plan or blueprint? Higher is better. | — | 33.6% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k averageTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document (around 128k tokens — roughly a long book). Higher is better. | — | 77.3% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 1M pointwiseTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside an enormous document (around 1 million tokens — many books). Higher is better. | — | 26.6% |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Composer 2.5 shipped 1 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash | |
Which is better: Composer 2.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Composer 2.5 leads Gemini 3.5 Flash on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (CursorBench v3.1). Composer 2.5 shipped 1 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On CursorBench v3.1, Composer 2.5 leads at 63.2% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 49.8%.
Frequently asked questions
Composer 2.5 was released by Cursor on May 18 2026.
Gemini 3.5 Flash was released by Google on May 19 2026.
Composer 2.5 leads on CursorBench v3.1 — Composer 2.5 63.2% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash 49.8%.
Other comparisons
Composer 2.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5Composer 2.5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 SolComposer 2.5 vs Muse SparkGemini 3.5 Flash vs Muse SparkComposer 2.5 vs Grok 4.3 BetaGemini 3.5 Flash vs Grok 4.3 BetaComposer 2.5 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGemini 3.5 Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-ProComposer 2.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5