Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-4-9B
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 | Z.ai GLM-4-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Z.ai |
| Release date | May 28 2026 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 9B |
Context window | 1M | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 95% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 69.2% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 74.6% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 49.8% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 57.9% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 53.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | 1890 | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GLM-4-9B shipped 722 days before Claude Opus 4.8 | |
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM-4-9B?
Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 722 days before Claude Opus 4.8, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Opus 4.8 is proprietary, while GLM-4-9B is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Opus 4.8 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.8 was released by Anthropic on May 28 2026.
GLM-4-9B was released by Z.ai on Jun 5 2024.
Claude Opus 4.8 is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. GLM-4-9B is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 SolGLM-4-9B vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini OmniGLM-4-9B vs Gemini OmniClaude Opus 4.8 vs Muse SparkGLM-4-9B vs Muse SparkClaude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.3 BetaGLM-4-9B vs Grok 4.3 BetaClaude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-4-9B vs DeepSeek-V4-ProClaude Opus 4.8 vs Mistral Medium 3.5GLM-4-9B vs Mistral Medium 3.5