Composer 2.5vsGLM-5.3-Flash

Composer 2.5
GLM-5.3-Flash
Specifications
Parameters
320B
Context window
1M
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.1
73%84.3%
Benchmarks
SWE-Bench Pro
54%
SWE-Bench Multilingual
79.8%
DeepSWE 1.1
63.4%
DeepSWE 1.0
18%
Next.js Evals
92%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
69.3%
Humanity's Last Exam · with tools
55.3%
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1
26.3%
AutomationBench
48.8%
GDPval-AA v2
1773
Overview
CompanySpaceXAIZ.ai
Release dateMay 18 2026Aug 26 2026
AccessProprietaryOpen Weight

Other comparisons

Composer 2.5vsClaude Opus 5GLM-5.3-FlashvsClaude Opus 5Composer 2.5vsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-5.3-FlashvsGPT-5.6 SolComposer 2.5vsGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-5.3-FlashvsGemini 3.7 FlashComposer 2.5vsMuse GlimmerGLM-5.3-FlashvsMuse GlimmerComposer 2.5vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GLM-5.3-FlashvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Composer 2.5vsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-5.3-FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5

Frequently asked questions

GLM-5.3-Flash leads Composer 2.5 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.1). Composer 2.5 shipped 100 days before GLM-5.3-Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Composer 2.5 is proprietary, while GLM-5.3-Flash is open weight.

On Terminal-Bench 2.1, GLM-5.3-Flash leads at 84.3% vs Composer 2.5 at 73%.

Composer 2.5 was released by SpaceXAI on May 18 2026.

GLM-5.3-Flash was released by Z.ai on Aug 26 2026.

GLM-5.3-Flash leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — Composer 2.5 73% vs GLM-5.3-Flash 84.3%.

Composer 2.5 is a proprietary model released by SpaceXAI. GLM-5.3-Flash is an open weight model released by Z.ai.