Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGLM-4.7
Qwen3-Coder-Next | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 80B | — |
Context window | 256k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 44.3% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 70.6% | 73.8%Best |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 62.8% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 36.2% | 41%Best |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Feb 3 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Qwen3-Coder-Next or GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0). GLM-4.7 shipped 43 days before Qwen3-Coder-Next, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 256k (Qwen3-Coder-Next) vs 128k (GLM-4.7).
On SWE-Bench Verified, GLM-4.7 leads at 73.8% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 70.6%. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, GLM-4.7 leads at 41% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 36.2%.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
GLM-4.7 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Qwen3-Coder-Next 70.6% vs GLM-4.7 73.8%.
Qwen3-Coder-Next has a 256k context window; GLM-4.7 has 128k.
Other comparisons
Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.7vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3-Coder-NextvsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.7vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.7vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.5GLM-4.7vsGrok 4.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-4.7vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731