Muse Spark 1.1vsQwen3-Coder-Next
Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 80B |
Context window | — | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 61.5%Best | 44.3% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 70.6% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 62.8% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 53.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 80% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 36.2% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 88.1% | — |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 54.7% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 75.6% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 62.1% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
Tax questions TaxEval v2A set of real tax questions created by Vals AI — can the AI give accurate answers about tax rules and filings? Higher is better. | 79.72% | — |
Medical admin work MedScribeCan the AI support doctors with their administrative work, like notes and paperwork? Created by Vals AI. Higher is better. | 88.89% | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 88.4% | — |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | 76.3% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1490 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1540 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Jul 9 2026 | Feb 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Pro). Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 156 days before Muse Spark 1.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 61.5% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 44.3%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Spark 1.1 61.5% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next 44.3%.
Muse Spark 1.1 is a proprietary model released by Meta. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.1vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.1vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.1vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1vsGrok 4.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.5Muse Spark 1.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse Spark 1.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5