DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGLM-4.7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 41% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 70.3% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 76.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 25.1% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jul 31 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GLM-4.7?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4.7 shipped 221 days before DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released by DeepSeek on Jul 31 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is a proprietary model released by DeepSeek. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsClaude Opus 5GLM-4.7vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7vsGPT-5.6 SolDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-4.7vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.7vsMuse Spark 1.1DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGrok 4.5GLM-4.7vsGrok 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-4.7vsMistral Medium 3.5