GPT-5.5-ProvsQwen3.7-Max
GPT-5.5-Pro | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 36% | 71%Best |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 83% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 90.1% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 52.4% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 39.6% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 92.4% |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Apr 23 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.5-Pro or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads GPT-5.5-Pro on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). GPT-5.5-Pro shipped 27 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 71% vs GPT-5.5-Pro at 36%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.5-Pro was released by OpenAI on Apr 23 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.5-ProvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.5-ProvsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.5-ProvsMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.5-ProvsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5GPT-5.5-ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-5.5-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5