DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGPT-5.5-Pro
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | GPT-5.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 38%Best | 36% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 83% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.7% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 70.3% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 90.1% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 76.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 57.2% |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | — | 52.4% |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | — | 39.6% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 25.1% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | — | 82.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 31 2026 | Apr 23 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GPT-5.5-Pro?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads GPT-5.5-Pro on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). GPT-5.5-Pro shipped 99 days before DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads at 38% vs GPT-5.5-Pro at 36%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released by DeepSeek on Jul 31 2026.
GPT-5.5-Pro was released by OpenAI on Apr 23 2026.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.5-ProvsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.5-ProvsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMuse Spark 1.1GPT-5.5-ProvsMuse Spark 1.1DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGrok 4.5GPT-5.5-ProvsGrok 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.5-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsKimi K3GPT-5.5-ProvsKimi K3