GPT-5.4-ProvsQwen3.8-27B
GPT-5.4-Pro | Qwen3.8-27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 27B |
Context window | — | 262k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 61.7% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 42.2% |
Repo-level code generation NL2Repo-BenchTests whether the AI can turn a natural-language requirement into working code across an entire repository, not just produce a single function or patch. Higher is better. | — | 42.3% |
Software engineering QwenSWEBenchQwen's in-house coding benchmark for evaluating a model's ability to complete software-engineering work. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
Competitive coding LiveCodeBenchCoding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 90.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 73% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 33.4% |
Long-horizon office work CoWorkBenchTests long-running office tasks across fields including computer science, finance, law, medicine, and other productivity work. Higher is better. | — | 70.7% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 89.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 30.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 94.4%Best | 89.2% |
Instruction following IFBenchTests whether the AI can follow detailed instructions and satisfy multiple constraints at once. Higher is better. | — | 79.5% |
Agentic computer use Agent's Last Exam · pass@1A hard set of desktop and operating-system tasks an AI agent has to finish by looking at the screen and working the machine itself. The score is the share it passes outright — partial credit does not count. Higher is better. | — | 20.4% |
Agentic computer use Agent's Last Exam · scoreThe graded score on the same desktop and operating-system tasks in Agent's Last Exam, giving partial credit for progress beyond the strict pass-or-fail result. Higher is better. | — | 42.9% |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 5 2026 | Aug 14 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: GPT-5.4-Pro or Qwen3.8-27B?
GPT-5.4-Pro leads Qwen3.8-27B on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GPT-5.4-Pro shipped 162 days before Qwen3.8-27B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
GPT-5.4-Pro is proprietary, while Qwen3.8-27B is open weight.
On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 94.4% vs Qwen3.8-27B at 89.2%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
Qwen3.8-27B was released by Qwen on Aug 14 2026.
GPT-5.4-Pro leads on GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.4-Pro 94.4% vs Qwen3.8-27B 89.2%.
GPT-5.4-Pro is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen3.8-27B is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.4-ProvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-27BvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.4-ProvsGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8-27BvsGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.4-ProvsMuse GlimmerQwen3.8-27BvsMuse GlimmerGPT-5.4-ProvsGrok 4.6Qwen3.8-27BvsGrok 4.6GPT-5.4-ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3.8-27BvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GPT-5.4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8-27BvsMistral Medium 3.5