DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsQwen3.8-27B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Qwen3.8-27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 27B |
Context window | — | 262k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 61.7% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 42.2% |
Repo-level code generation NL2Repo-BenchTests whether the AI can turn a natural-language requirement into working code across an entire repository, not just produce a single function or patch. Higher is better. | — | 42.3% |
Software engineering QwenSWEBenchQwen's in-house coding benchmark for evaluating a model's ability to complete software-engineering work. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
Competitive coding LiveCodeBenchCoding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 90.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9%Best | 73% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 33.4% |
Long-horizon office work CoWorkBenchTests long-running office tasks across fields including computer science, finance, law, medicine, and other productivity work. Higher is better. | — | 70.7% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7%Best | 30.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 89.2% |
Instruction following IFBenchTests whether the AI can follow detailed instructions and satisfy multiple constraints at once. Higher is better. | — | 79.5% |
Agentic computer use Agent's Last Exam · pass@1A hard set of desktop and operating-system tasks an AI agent has to finish by looking at the screen and working the machine itself. The score is the share it passes outright — partial credit does not count. Higher is better. | — | 20.4% |
Agentic computer use Agent's Last Exam · scoreThe graded score on the same desktop and operating-system tasks in Agent's Last Exam, giving partial credit for progress beyond the strict pass-or-fail result. Higher is better. | — | 42.9% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Aug 14 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.8-27B?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads Qwen3.8-27B on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.1, Humanity's Last Exam). DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 shipped 1 days before Qwen3.8-27B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is proprietary, while Qwen3.8-27B is open weight.
On Terminal-Bench 2.1, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 87.9% vs Qwen3.8-27B at 73%. On Humanity's Last Exam · no tools, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 42.7% vs Qwen3.8-27B at 30.8%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Qwen3.8-27B was released by Qwen on Aug 14 2026.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 87.9% vs Qwen3.8-27B 73%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · no tools — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 42.7% vs Qwen3.8-27B 30.8%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is a proprietary model released by DeepSeek. Qwen3.8-27B is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-27BvsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberQwen3.8-27BvsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8-27BvsGemini 3.7 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse GlimmerQwen3.8-27BvsMuse GlimmerDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Qwen3.8-27BvsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8-27BvsMistral Medium 3.5