GPT-5.4-ProvsGrok 4.6
GPT-5.4-Pro | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | — | 69.9% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 65.9% |
Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) · extended splitfrontier-difficulty agentic coding tasks (v1.1, extended split) | — | 61.3% |
Expert software engineering APEX-SWEexpert-level software-engineering tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 56.4% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 3.0command-line task completion (v3.0, much harder task set) | — | 26% |
Expert agentic work APEX-Agentsexpert-level agentic work tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 57.5% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 89.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
Advanced math FrontierMath · Tier 4Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 94.4% | — |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 15.8% |
Overall intelligence AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 61 |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1753 |
Knowledge work AA-BriefcaseArtificial Analysis agentic office-work eval (Elo) | — | 1577 |
Knowledge work GDPval (win/tie rate)How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Mar 5 2026 | Aug 12 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.4-Pro or Grok 4.6?
GPT-5.4-Pro and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GPT-5.4-Pro shipped 160 days before Grok 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5.4-Pro and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
Grok 4.6 was released by SpaceXAI on Aug 12 2026.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.4-ProvsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.6vsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.4-ProvsGemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.6vsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.4-ProvsMuse GlimmerGrok 4.6vsMuse GlimmerGPT-5.4-ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813GPT-5.4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.4-ProvsKimi K3Grok 4.6vsKimi K3