GPT-5.4-ProvsQwen3.6-Plus
GPT-5.4-Pro | Qwen3.6-Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $30.00 | $0.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $180.00 | $3.00 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $30.00Azure | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $180.00Azure | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 58.7% | 28.8% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 72% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 78.8% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 89.3% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
FrontierMath · Tier 4Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 94.4% | — |
GDPval (win/tie rate)Knowledge work — How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 5 2026 | Apr 2 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro leads Qwen3.6-Plus on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Humanity's Last Exam). Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper on both input and output: $0.50 vs $30.00 per million input tokens, and $3.00 vs $180.00 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. GPT-5.4-Pro shipped 28 days before Qwen3.6-Plus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 58.7% vs Qwen3.6-Plus at 28.8%.
GPT-5.4-Pro was released by OpenAI on Mar 5 2026.
Qwen3.6-Plus was released by Qwen on Apr 2 2026.
GPT-5.4-Pro leads on Humanity's Last Exam · with tools — GPT-5.4-Pro 58.7% vs Qwen3.6-Plus 28.8%.
Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper on both input and output: $0.50 vs $30.00 per million input tokens, and $3.00 vs $180.00 per million output tokens. Figures are base-tier rates. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.