Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.25 | $15.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $10.00 | $60.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.125 | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.625OpenAI | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $5.00OpenAI | — |
| $750OpenAI list price | $6,000OpenAI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 88.1% | 73.3% |
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 25% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.3% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 76% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Nov 12 2025 | Sep 12 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
GPT-5.1vsClaude Haiku 5.5o1-previewvsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.1vsGemini 4 Argono1-previewvsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.1vsMuse Wondero1-previewvsMuse WonderGPT-5.1vsGrok 4.7o1-previewvsGrok 4.7GPT-5.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flasho1-previewvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.1vsMistral Large 4o1-previewvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.1 leads o1-preview on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). GPT-5.1 is cheaper on both input and output: $1.25 vs $15.00 per million input tokens, and $10.00 vs $60.00 per million output tokens. o1-preview shipped 426 days before GPT-5.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.1 leads at 88.1% vs o1-preview at 73.3%.