Kimi K2.7 CodevsNemotron 3 Nano
Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 30B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.95 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $4.00 | — |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.19 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.67Inceptron | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $3.40DeepInfra | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 31% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 75% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 68.3% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 73% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Jun 12 2026 | Dec 15 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Source |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Nano don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a verified first-party API price: $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Nano. Nemotron 3 Nano shipped 179 days before Kimi K2.7 Code, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2.7 Code has 1T parameters, while Nemotron 3 Nano has 30B. Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight, while Nemotron 3 Nano is open source.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Nano don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Kimi K2.7 Code was released by Moonshot AI on Jun 12 2026.
Nemotron 3 Nano was released by NVIDIA on Dec 15 2025.
Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a verified first-party API price: $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3 Nano. Rates are pay-as-you-go API prices verified on August 18, 2026.
Kimi K2.7 Code is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI. Nemotron 3 Nano is an open source model released by NVIDIA.