Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 24B | 48B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.075DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.20DeepInfra | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Jun 20 2025 | Oct 30 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral Small 3.2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi LinearvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Small 3.2vsGPT-6.1 SolKimi LinearvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Small 3.2vsGemini 4 ArgonKimi LinearvsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Small 3.2vsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi LinearvsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral Small 3.2vsGrok 4.7Kimi LinearvsGrok 4.7Mistral Small 3.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi LinearvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Mistral Small 3.2 and Kimi Linear don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral Small 3.2 shipped 132 days before Kimi Linear, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Mistral Small 3.2 has 24B parameters, while Kimi Linear has 48B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Small 3.2 and Kimi Linear don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.