Muse Spark 1.2vsGLM-5.1
Muse Spark 1.2 | GLM-5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 744B |
Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 22% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 75% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 63.5% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 52.3% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.2% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1518 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Z.ai |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Apr 7 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or GLM-5.1?
Muse Spark 1.2 and GLM-5.1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-5.1 shipped 120 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 200k (GLM-5.1). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while GLM-5.1 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and GLM-5.1 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.
GLM-5.1 was released by Z.ai on Apr 7 2026.
Muse Spark 1.2 has a 1M context window; GLM-5.1 has 200k.
Muse Spark 1.2 is a proprietary model released by Meta. GLM-5.1 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Opus 5GLM-5.1vsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-5.1vsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.6 FlashGLM-5.1vsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.5GLM-5.1vsGrok 4.5Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GLM-5.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-5.1vsMistral Medium 3.5