Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5
Muse Spark 1.2 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 128B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $7.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25Meta | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25Meta | — |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.6% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Mistral |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Apr 29 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Fable 5.1Mistral Medium 3.5vsClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-6 AstraMistral Medium 3.5vsGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.6Mistral Medium 3.5vsGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMistral Medium 3.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsKimi K3Mistral Medium 3.5vsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Medium 3.5 has a verified first-party API price: $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Muse Spark 1.2. Mistral Medium 3.5 shipped 98 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 256k (Mistral Medium 3.5). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while Mistral Medium 3.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and Mistral Medium 3.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.