Muse GlimmervsComposer 2.5
Muse Glimmer | Composer 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 30B | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 51.2% | 54%Best |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76% | — |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 79.8% |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | — | 56.1% |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | — | 63.2% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.0Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. Higher is better. | — | 18% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 92% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 51.7% | 73%Best |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.3% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 75.5% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 22% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.5% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 953 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 78.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1359 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Aug 10 2026 | May 18 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Which is better: Muse Glimmer or Composer 2.5?
Composer 2.5 leads Muse Glimmer on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1). Composer 2.5 shipped 84 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Glimmer is open weight, while Composer 2.5 is proprietary.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Composer 2.5 leads at 54% vs Muse Glimmer at 51.2%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Composer 2.5 leads at 73% vs Muse Glimmer at 51.7%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
Composer 2.5 was released by SpaceXAI on May 18 2026.
Composer 2.5 leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Glimmer 51.2% vs Composer 2.5 54%.
Muse Glimmer is an open weight model released by Meta. Composer 2.5 is a proprietary model released by SpaceXAI.
Other comparisons
Muse GlimmervsClaude Opus 5Composer 2.5vsClaude Opus 5Muse GlimmervsGPT-5.6-CyberComposer 2.5vsGPT-5.6-CyberMuse GlimmervsGemini 3.7 FlashComposer 2.5vsGemini 3.7 FlashMuse GlimmervsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Composer 2.5vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse GlimmervsMistral Medium 3.5Composer 2.5vsMistral Medium 3.5Muse GlimmervsKimi K3Composer 2.5vsKimi K3