LLaMA 3.2vsKimi Linear
LLaMA 3.2 | Kimi Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1B/3B | 48B |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.027Cloudflare | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.201Cloudflare | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Sep 25 2024 | Oct 30 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.2vsClaude Opus 5Kimi LinearvsClaude Opus 5LLaMA 3.2vsGPT-5.6 SolKimi LinearvsGPT-5.6 SolLLaMA 3.2vsGemini 3.7 FlashKimi LinearvsGemini 3.7 FlashLLaMA 3.2vsGrok 4.6Kimi LinearvsGrok 4.6LLaMA 3.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Kimi LinearvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813LLaMA 3.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Kimi LinearvsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.2 and Kimi Linear don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 3.2 shipped 400 days before Kimi Linear, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.2 has 1B/3B parameters, while Kimi Linear has 48B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 3.2 and Kimi Linear don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
LLaMA 3.2 was released by Meta on Sep 25 2024.
Kimi Linear was released by Moonshot AI on Oct 30 2025.