Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.15 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $0.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.075 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.02DeepInfra | $0.15Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.04DeepInfra | $0.60Azure |
| $6.00DeepInfra · fp8 | $60.00OpenAI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | 2% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 40.2% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 23 2024 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.1vsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o minivsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 3.1vsGemini 4 ArgonGPT-4o minivsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 3.1vsGrok 4.7GPT-4o minivsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-4o minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLLaMA 3.1vsMistral Large 4GPT-4o minivsMistral Large 4LLaMA 3.1vsKimi K3GPT-4o minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.1 leads GPT-4o mini on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only GPT-4o mini has a verified first-party API price: $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for LLaMA 3.1. GPT-4o mini shipped 5 days before LLaMA 3.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 3.1 is open weight, while GPT-4o mini is closed.
On BullshitBench v2, LLaMA 3.1 leads at 14% vs GPT-4o mini at 2%.