Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGLM-4.7
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 54.2% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 54% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 41% |
Browser agent BU BenchCan the AI drive a real web browser to finish tasks — clicking, filling forms, and navigating sites the way a person would? Run by Browser Use on their BU Bench task set. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1140 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1440 |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GLM-4.7 shipped 211 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Z.ai | |
| Release date | Jul 21 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.7?
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4.7 shipped 211 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released by Google on Jul 21 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a proprietary model released by Google. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsClaude Sonnet 5GLM-4.7vsClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGPT-5.6 SolGLM-4.7vsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark 1.1GLM-4.7vsMuse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.5GLM-4.7vsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-4.7vsDeepSeek-V4-ProGemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMistral Medium 3.5GLM-4.7vsMistral Medium 3.5