Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark 1.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 54.2% | 61.5%Best |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 54% | 80%Best |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 88.1% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 54.7% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | — | 75.6% |
Browser agent BU BenchCan the AI drive a real web browser to finish tasks — clicking, filling forms, and navigating sites the way a person would? Run by Browser Use on their BU Bench task set. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 62.1% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 74% | 80.8%Best |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 57.2% |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
Tax questions TaxEval v2A set of real tax questions created by Vals AI — can the AI give accurate answers about tax rules and filings? Higher is better. | — | 79.72% |
Medical admin work MedScribeCan the AI support doctors with their administrative work, like notes and paperwork? Created by Vals AI. Higher is better. | — | 88.89% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1140 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 88.4% |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | — | 76.3% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1490 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1540 |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 12 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | |
| Release date | Jul 21 2026 | Jul 9 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on 3 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1, OSWorld-Verified). Muse Spark 1.1 shipped 12 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 61.5% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 54.2%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 80% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 54%. On OSWorld-Verified, Muse Spark 1.1 leads at 80.8% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 74%.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released by Google on Jul 21 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 54.2% vs Muse Spark 1.1 61.5%.
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsClaude Sonnet 5Muse Spark 1.1vsClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.1vsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.5Muse Spark 1.1vsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1vsDeepSeek-V4-ProGemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsKimi K3Muse Spark 1.1vsKimi K3