Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsQwen3.7-Max
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 65% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 54.2% | 60.6%Best |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 54% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Browser agent BU BenchCan the AI drive a real web browser to finish tasks — clicking, filling forms, and navigating sites the way a person would? Run by Browser Use on their BU Bench task set. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 92.4% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1140 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1447 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Jul 21 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Pro). Qwen3.7-Max shipped 62 days before Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 60.6% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 54.2%.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released by Google on Jul 21 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 54.2% vs Qwen3.7-Max 60.6%.
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.7-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Gemini 3.5 Flash-LitevsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5