Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.25 | $0.15 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $1.50 | $0.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.025 | $0.075 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.125Google | $0.15Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.75Google | $0.60Azure |
| $125Google list price | $60.00OpenAI list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 11% | 2% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 40.2% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | |
| Release date | Mar 3 2026 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4o minivsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsMuse WonderGPT-4o minivsMuse WonderGemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7GPT-4o minivsGrok 4.7Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-4o minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4GPT-4o minivsMistral Large 4Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsKimi K3GPT-4o minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads GPT-4o mini on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). GPT-4o mini is cheaper on both input and output: $0.15 vs $0.25 per million input tokens, and $0.60 vs $1.50 per million output tokens. GPT-4o mini shipped 593 days before Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads at 11% vs GPT-4o mini at 2%.