Gemini 3.0 ProvsQwen3.8-Max
Gemini 3.0 Pro | Qwen3.8-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 2.4T |
Context window | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 67.7% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.2% | — |
Research reproduction PaperBenchreproducing the results of an ML research paper end to end | — | 93% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 67% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 86.6% |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 53.4% |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 31.1% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.9% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 86.1% |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 88.4% |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | — | 82% |
Multimodal MMMUTests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 81% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1486 | 1497Best |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1439 | 1667Best |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Nov 18 2025 | Aug 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Gemini 3.0 Pro or Qwen3.8-Max?
Qwen3.8-Max leads Gemini 3.0 Pro on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Arena Elo (Text), Arena Elo (Code)). Gemini 3.0 Pro shipped 258 days before Qwen3.8-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Arena Elo (Text), Qwen3.8-Max leads at 1497 vs Gemini 3.0 Pro at 1486. On Arena Elo (Code), Qwen3.8-Max leads at 1667 vs Gemini 3.0 Pro at 1439.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Pro was released by Google on Nov 18 2025.
Qwen3.8-Max was released by Qwen on Aug 3 2026.
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 ProvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-MaxvsClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.0 ProvsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.8-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.0 ProvsMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.8-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.2Gemini 3.0 ProvsGrok 4.5Qwen3.8-MaxvsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.0 ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.8-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Gemini 3.0 ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5