Gemini 3.0 ProvsQwen3-Coder
Gemini 3.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 480B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $5.00 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.22Google |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.00DeepInfra |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 48% | 20% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76.2% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 52% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 31.1% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.9% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 81% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Nov 18 2025 | Jul 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 ProvsClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3-CodervsClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.0 ProvsGPT-6 SolQwen3-CodervsGPT-6 SolGemini 3.0 ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3-CodervsMuse Spark 1.3Gemini 3.0 ProvsGrok 4.7Qwen3-CodervsGrok 4.7Gemini 3.0 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen3-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 3.0 ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-CodervsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Pro leads Qwen3-Coder on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Qwen3-Coder has a verified first-party API price: $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemini 3.0 Pro. Qwen3-Coder shipped 119 days before Gemini 3.0 Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.0 Pro is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemini 3.0 Pro leads at 48% vs Qwen3-Coder at 20%.