Gemini 3.0 FlashvsQwen3-Coder-Next
Gemini 3.0 Flash | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 80B |
Context window | — | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 49.6%Best | 44.3% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 78%Best | 70.6% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 62.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 58% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 36.2% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 62% | — |
General tool use ToolathlonTests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | 49.4% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 33.7% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | 33.6% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 90.4% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.1% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 42.6% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | 1204 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 81.2% | — |
Spatial reasoning Blueprint-Bench 2Can the AI reason about space and layout — for example, understanding a floor plan or blueprint? Higher is better. | 0% | — |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k averageTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document (around 128k tokens — roughly a long book). Higher is better. | 67.2% | — |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 1M pointwiseTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside an enormous document (around 1 million tokens — many books). Higher is better. | 22.1% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1437 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Dec 17 2025 | Feb 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Gemini 3.0 Flash or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Gemini 3.0 Flash leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified). Gemini 3.0 Flash shipped 48 days before Qwen3-Coder-Next, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Gemini 3.0 Flash is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Gemini 3.0 Flash leads at 49.6% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 44.3%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Gemini 3.0 Flash leads at 78% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 70.6%.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.0 Flash was released by Google on Dec 17 2025.
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
Gemini 3.0 Flash leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Gemini 3.0 Flash 49.6% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next 44.3%.
Gemini 3.0 Flash is a proprietary model released by Google. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.0 FlashvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.0 FlashvsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMuse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.0 FlashvsGrok 4.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Gemini 3.0 FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5