Gemini 2.5 ProvsGrok 4.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 59.6% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | — | 69.9% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 65.9% |
Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) · extended splitfrontier-difficulty agentic coding tasks (v1.1, extended split) | — | 61.3% |
Expert software engineering APEX-SWEexpert-level software-engineering tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 56.4% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 3.0command-line task completion (v3.0, much harder task set) | — | 26% |
Expert agentic work APEX-Agentsexpert-level agentic work tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 57.5% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 86.4% | — |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 15.8% |
Overall intelligence AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 61 |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1753 |
Knowledge work AA-BriefcaseArtificial Analysis agentic office-work eval (Elo) | — | 1577 |
Multimodal MMMUTests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1224 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | SpaceXAI | |
| Release date | Mar 25 2025 | Aug 12 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 4.6?
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 2.5 Pro shipped 505 days before Grok 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro was released by Google on Mar 25 2025.
Grok 4.6 was released by SpaceXAI on Aug 12 2026.
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.5 ProvsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.6vsClaude Opus 5Gemini 2.5 ProvsGPT-5.6-CyberGrok 4.6vsGPT-5.6-CyberGemini 2.5 ProvsMuse GlimmerGrok 4.6vsMuse GlimmerGemini 2.5 ProvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Gemini 2.5 ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 2.5 ProvsKimi K3Grok 4.6vsKimi K3