DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 2.5 Pro
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 59.6% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.4% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Multimodal MMMUTests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1224 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Mar 25 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 2.5 Pro don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 2.5 Pro shipped 506 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 2.5 Pro don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was released by Google on Mar 25 2025.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5Gemini 2.5 ProvsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberGemini 2.5 ProvsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse GlimmerGemini 2.5 ProvsMuse GlimmerDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Gemini 2.5 ProvsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 2.5 ProvsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsKimi K3Gemini 2.5 ProvsKimi K3