Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $1.25 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $10.00 | — |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.125 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.625Google AI Studio | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $5.00Google AI Studio | — |
| $750Google list price | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 59.6% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 18.8% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 86.4% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | SpaceXSI | |
| Release date | Mar 25 2025 | Aug 14 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.5 ProvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok‑2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 ProvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok‑2vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.5 ProvsMuse Spark OpenGrok‑2vsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.5 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok‑2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.5 ProvsMistral Large 4Grok‑2vsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 ProvsKimi K3Grok‑2vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok‑2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a verified first-party API price: $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Grok‑2. Grok‑2 shipped 223 days before Gemini 2.5 Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Gemini 2.5 Pro) vs 128k (Grok‑2).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok‑2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.