DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.0 Flash
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Gemini 3.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 49.6% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 78% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9%Best | 58% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 62% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
General tool use ToolathlonTests how well the AI uses everyday real-world tools and apps to get things done. Higher is better. | — | 49.4% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7%Best | 33.7% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 33.6% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 90.4% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 65.1% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 42.6% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | — | 1204 |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 81.2% |
Spatial reasoning Blueprint-Bench 2Can the AI reason about space and layout — for example, understanding a floor plan or blueprint? Higher is better. | — | 0% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k averageTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside a very long document (around 128k tokens — roughly a long book). Higher is better. | — | 67.2% |
Long context MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 1M pointwiseTests whether the AI can find specific details buried inside an enormous document (around 1 million tokens — many books). Higher is better. | — | 22.1% |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1473 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1437 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Dec 17 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.0 Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads Gemini 3.0 Flash on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Terminal-Bench 2.1, Humanity's Last Exam). Gemini 3.0 Flash shipped 239 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Terminal-Bench 2.1, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 87.9% vs Gemini 3.0 Flash at 58%. On Humanity's Last Exam · no tools, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 42.7% vs Gemini 3.0 Flash at 33.7%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Gemini 3.0 Flash was released by Google on Dec 17 2025.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Terminal-Bench 2.1 — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 87.9% vs Gemini 3.0 Flash 58%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · no tools — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 42.7% vs Gemini 3.0 Flash 33.7%.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsClaude Opus 5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberGemini 3.0 FlashvsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse GlimmerGemini 3.0 FlashvsMuse GlimmerDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Gemini 3.0 FlashvsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 3.0 FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsKimi K3Gemini 3.0 FlashvsKimi K3