DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGPT-4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | GPT-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 8k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 38% | — |
Function synthesis HumanEval164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | — | 67% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.7% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 70.3% | — |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 76.7% | — |
General knowledge MMLUA 57-subject multiple-choice exam — history, law, medicine, maths — that was the standard measure of how much a model knows from 2020 until roughly 2024, when frontier scores crowded into the high 80s and labs moved on to harder tests. The scores here were published years apart under different testing setups, so read them as a historical record rather than a like-for-like ranking. Higher is better. | — | 86.4% |
Grade-school math GSM8KGrade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | — | 92% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 25.1% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 31 2026 | Mar 14 2023 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or GPT-4?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and GPT-4 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GPT-4 shipped 1235 days before DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and GPT-4 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released by DeepSeek on Jul 31 2026.
GPT-4 was released by OpenAI on Mar 14 2023.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsClaude Opus 5GPT-4vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-4vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMuse Spark 1.1GPT-4vsMuse Spark 1.1DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGrok 4.5GPT-4vsGrok 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-4vsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsKimi K3GPT-4vsKimi K3