Composer 2vsQwen3-Coder-Next

Composer 2
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Specifications
Parameters
80B
Context window
256k
Benchmarks
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
44.3%
Coding
SWE-Bench Verified
70.6%
Multilingual coding
SWE-Bench Multilingual
73.7%Best
62.8%
Agentic coding
CursorBench v3.1
52.2%
Next.js coding
Next.js Evals
75%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.0
61.7%Best
36.2%
Overview
CompanyCursorQwen
Release dateMar 19 2026Feb 3 2026
AccessProprietaryOpen Weight

Which is better: Composer 2 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Composer 2 leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Multilingual, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 44 days before Composer 2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Composer 2 is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.

On SWE-Bench Multilingual, Composer 2 leads at 73.7% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 62.8%. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, Composer 2 leads at 61.7% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 36.2%.

Frequently asked questions

Composer 2 was released by Cursor on Mar 19 2026.

Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.

Composer 2 leads on SWE-Bench Multilingual — Composer 2 73.7% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next 62.8%.

Composer 2 is a proprietary model released by Cursor. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen.

Other comparisons