Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGemini 3.6 Flash
Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 79% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 77.2% | — |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 49% |
ML engineering MLE-BenchCan the AI do the work of a machine-learning engineer? It competes in real Kaggle competitions — building, training, and tuning models end to end — and the score reflects how well it places. Higher is better. | — | 63.9% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 50% | — |
Browser agent BU BenchCan the AI drive a real web browser to finish tasks — clicking, filling forms, and navigating sites the way a person would? Run by Browser Use on their BU Bench task set. Higher is better. | — | 68% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 83% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1421 |
Multimodal MMMUTests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Claude Sonnet 4.5 shipped 295 days before Gemini 3.6 Flash | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Sep 29 2025 | Jul 21 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Sonnet 4.5 shipped 295 days before Gemini 3.6 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was released by Anthropic on Sep 29 2025.
Gemini 3.6 Flash was released by Google on Jul 21 2026.
Other comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGPT-5.6 SolGemini 3.6 FlashvsGPT-5.6 SolClaude Sonnet 4.5vsMuse Spark 1.1Gemini 3.6 FlashvsMuse Spark 1.1Claude Sonnet 4.5vsGrok 4.5Gemini 3.6 FlashvsGrok 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5vsDeepSeek-V4-ProGemini 3.6 FlashvsDeepSeek-V4-ProClaude Sonnet 4.5vsMistral Medium 3.5Gemini 3.6 FlashvsMistral Medium 3.5Claude Sonnet 4.5vsKimi K3Gemini 3.6 FlashvsKimi K3