Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meta LLaMA 2 — side-by-side specs.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 | Meta LLaMA 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | May 28 2026 | Jul 18 2023 |
| Model type | — | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | — |
Context window | — | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 69.2% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 74.6% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 49.8% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 57.9% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 53.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AAMeasures how well the AI does economically valuable knowledge work, judged against human experts. Shown as a rating (like a chess Elo) — higher is better. | 1890 | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | LLaMA 2 shipped 1045 days before Claude Opus 4.8 | |
Claude Opus 4.8 and LLaMA 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. LLaMA 2 shipped 1045 days before Claude Opus 4.8, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
LLaMA 2 is an open-source / open-weight model; Claude Opus 4.8 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Opus 4.8 and LLaMA 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.