Claude Opus 4.6vsQwen3-Coder-Next
Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 80B |
Context window | — | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 87% | — |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 44.3% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 80.8%Best | 70.6% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 62.8% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 75% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 36.2% |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 53% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.3% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1504 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1543 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Feb 5 2026 | Feb 3 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 2 days before Claude Opus 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.6 leads at 80.8% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 70.6%.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.6 was released by Anthropic on Feb 5 2026.
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-Bench Verified — Claude Opus 4.6 80.8% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next 70.6%.
Claude Opus 4.6 is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.6vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsGemini 3.6 FlashClaude Opus 4.6vsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMuse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.6vsGrok 4.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.5Claude Opus 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Claude Opus 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5