Claude Opus 4.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Claude Opus 4.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 43% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 74.5% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 87.9% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | — | 74.1% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | — | 83.3% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 42.7% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 60% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 80.9% | — |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | — | 31.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release date | Aug 5 2025 | Aug 13 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Opus 4.1 shipped 373 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.1 was released by Anthropic on Aug 5 2025.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.1vsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGPT-5.6-CyberClaude Opus 4.1vsGemini 3.7 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 4.1vsMuse GlimmerDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMuse GlimmerClaude Opus 4.1vsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGrok 4.6Claude Opus 4.1vsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsMistral Medium 3.5Claude Opus 4.1vsKimi K3DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsKimi K3