Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 62.3% | 95.5% |
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 88% |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 88% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 88% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 64.5% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 85% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Release date | Feb 24 2025 | Jun 9 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Mythos 5vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3.7 SonnetvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Mythos 5vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3.7 SonnetvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Mythos 5vsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3.7 SonnetvsGrok 4.7Claude Mythos 5vsGrok 4.7Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Mythos 5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3.7 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Claude Mythos 5vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Mythos 5 leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Claude 3.7 Sonnet shipped 470 days before Claude Mythos 5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Mythos 5 leads at 95.5% vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet at 62.3%.