Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 9k | 1M |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 78.8% |
SWE-Marathon v1.1Multi-hour coding — Twenty multi-hour programming jobs — rebuilding a library, cloning a product, training a model, making something faster. A run counts only when every check passes, hidden tests and interface review included. Higher is better. | — | 53.1% |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 70.5% |
AutomationBenchBusiness workflows — Tests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | — | 39.1% |
Finance Agent v2Agentic financial analysis — Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | — | 56.6% |
HealthBench ProfessionalHealth — Realistic health conversations graded against detailed rubrics written by physicians — can the AI respond the way a careful medical professional would? Higher is better. | — | 60.5% |
GDP.PDFDocument comprehension — Real professional PDFs — filings, reports, technical documents — with questions an expert in that field would ask. Tests whether the AI reads the page as a document, layout and figures included, rather than as loose text. Higher is better. | — | 30.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | Mar 14 2023 | Oct 12 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 1vsGPT-6.1 SolMuse WondervsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 1vsGemini 4 ArgonMuse WondervsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 1vsGrok 4.7Muse WondervsGrok 4.7Claude 1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse WondervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 1vsMistral Large 4Muse WondervsMistral Large 4Claude 1vsKimi K3Muse WondervsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 1 and Muse Wonder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 1 shipped 1308 days before Muse Wonder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 9k (Claude 1) vs 1M (Muse Wonder).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 1 and Muse Wonder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.